FINRA

Published on: October 8, 2013

Recovery of Losses Sustained in Senior Secured Zero Coupon Notes

Securities fraud attorneys are currently investigating claims on behalf of investors who suffered significant losses as a result of doing business with Thomas O. Mikolasko, a former HFP Capital Markets broker. Specifically, the investigations are looking into whether HFP Capital Markets provided adequate supervision over Mikolasko when he allegedly caused certain material omissions and misrepresentations of material facts to be made regarding the sale of “Senior Secured Zero Coupon Notes.”

Recovery of Losses Sustained in Senior Secured Zero Coupon Notes

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) issued an Order Accepting Offer of Settlement which stated, “Mikolasko was an investment banker at HFP who engaged in activity to facilitate the firm’s sale of $3 million in ‘Senior Secured Zero Coupon Notes’ sold to 58 customers of HFP for an entity known as Metals Millings and Mining LLC (‘MMM’). The notes defaulted and investors were not repaid either principal or a promised 100 percent return. Mikolasko allegedly caused material misrepresentations and omissions of material facts to be made in connection with the firm’s sales of the offering. Mikolasko also allegedly participated in various roles to facilitate the offering even though he knew or should have known that HFP had conducted inadequate due diligence concerning the offering and that the due diligence the firm had conducted identified significant ‘red flags’ as to the facts and circumstances of the offering.”

Mikolasko was suspended for 18 months from associating in any capacity with any FINRA member firm and fined $75,000 for his alleged conduct. However, stock fraud lawyers say that clients of Mikolasko may be able to recover losses through securities arbitration.

Published on: October 3, 2013

Gray Firm Files FINRA Claim Concerning UBS Puerto Rico Fund Known As Puerto Rico Fixed Income Fund I

by InvestorLawyers

Law Office of Christopher J. Gray, P.C., a New York City law firm handling arbitration claims on behalf of investors throughout the United States, has filed a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) arbitration claim involving a retiree’s investment in a closed-end fund known as Puerto Rico Fixed Income Fund I (CUSIP No. 744907106, hereinafter “Fund I”). The fund was structured by UBS Puerto Rico, a unit of the Swiss banking giant UBS AG (NYSE:UBS). The case is pending in Miami, Florida.

The arbitration claim alleges that Fund I was sold by Merrill Lynch as one of a group of safe mutual funds that were largely invested in municipal bonds issued by the Puerto Rico government. The closed-end funds such as Fund I are solely for sale to residents of Puerto Rico and have reportedly been heavily marketed there by UBS and other brokerage firms (including Merrill Lynch) for at least the past 5 years. Several of the 23 closed-end funds in question have reportedly lost over half their value, despite being marketed as safe investments.

The New York Times Dealbook blog reports that some UBS customers were encouraged by its brokers to borrow money to invest in these funds and that in some cases, money was lent improperly, exacerbating current losses. A number of UBS clients have reportedly been forced to liquidate hundreds of millions of dollars in holdings in these funds to meet margin calls. Robert Mulholland, the head of wealth management advisers in the Americas for UBS, reportedly characterized the closed-end fund issue as ”the perfect storm” in a meeting in San Juan last month.

Published on: October 3, 2013

UBS Allegedly Mislead CDO Investors, Ordered to Pay $50 Million by SEC

by InvestorLawyers

Investment fraud lawyers are currently investigating claims regarding UBS Securities. UBS Securities has agreed to pay almost $50 million to settle charges that it violated securities laws regarding certain collateralized debt obligation, or “CDO”, investments. The charges apply to the firm’s structuring and marketing of ACA ABS 2007-2 — a CDO, or collateralized debt obligation. Allegedly, UBS failed to disclose the fact that it retained millions in upfront cash while acquiring collateral. The SEC officially charged UBS on August 6, 2013.

dv563009UBS_Allegedly_Mislead_CDO_Investors_Ordered_to_Pay_50_Million_by_SEC

The collateral for the CDO was managed by ACA Management and reportedly was primarily consisted of CDS on subprime RMBS, or residential mortgage-backed securities. According to securities arbitration lawyers, the CDO — as the “insurer” — received premiums from the CDS collateral on a monthly basis. Then the premiums were used for CDO bondholder payments. According to the SEC, ACA and UBS agreed that the collateral manager would seek bids for yield that contained both a fixed running spread and upfront cash in the form of “points.”

According to the SEC’s findings, UBS collected upfront payments totaling $23.6 million while acquiring collateral and, instead of transferring the upfront fees at the same time as the collateral, UBS kept the upfront payments and chose not to disclose this information. In addition to retaining the undisclosed $23.6 million, it also retained a disclosed fee of $10.8 million. Investment fraud lawyers say the decision not to disclose the retention of the upfront points was inconsistent with prior UBS deals and the industry standard. Allegedly, UBS’ head of the U.S. CDO group stated, “Let’s see how much money we can draw out of the deal.”

Published on: October 1, 2013

Citigroup Held Liable for Investor Losses from Adviser’s Selling Away

by InvestorLawyers

Securities fraud attorneys are currently investigating claims on behalf of investors who suffered significant losses because their full-service brokerage firm-registered adviser engaged in “selling away.” Selling away occurs when an adviser sells investments without their firm’s knowledge or approval. According to stock fraud lawyers, firms have a responsibility to adequately supervise their registered representatives and can be held liable for client losses if they fail to provide such supervision.

126216941Citigroup_Held_Liable_for_Investor_Losses_from_Adviser’s_Selling_Away

Recently, Citigroup was found liable for $3.1 million in a FINRA claim filed by a Florida couple. The couple had filed a case in 2010 against Citigroup, alleging negligence and fraud involving more than $1 million in investments. The real estate investments were reportedly made from 2004 to 2007 in condominium developments and real estate projects. The couple’s adviser, Scott Andrew King, was registered with Citigroup from 2002 until 2005. King reportedly referred the claimants to Lawton “Bud” Chiles III without Citigroup’s knowledge. Currently, King works as a broker for Wells Fargo Advisors.

In addition, the claimants were reportedly included in a group of investors who signed personal loan guarantees connected to a $12 million loan to one of the real estate projects. When the loan entered into default, a $10 million judgment was entered against the group. Reportedly, each investor named in the judgment could potentially have to pay the entire amount of the bad loan. The $3.1 million award includes $2.1 million to cover the plaintiffs’ share of the judgment and $1 million in losses. In addition, in the event that the couple is required to pay the entire $10 million judgment, Citigroup will be required to reimburse them the entire amount.

Published on: September 19, 2013

Morgan Stanley Fined by FINRA

by InvestorLawyers

Securities fraud attorneys are currently investigating claims on behalf of customers of Morgan Stanley and other full-service brokerage firms regarding the sales of bonds and other securities. In some cases, full service brokerage firms may have failed to provide fair and reasonable prices or best execution in some customer transactions involving municipal bonds, corporate bonds, agency bonds or other securities.

According to a FINRA news release, on August 22, 2013, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority fined Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC for failure to provide reasonable prices in certain municipal bond customer transactions and failure to provide best execution in certain corporate and agency bond customer transactions. The firms were fined $1 million and ordered to pay restitution and interest in the amount of $188,000, above and beyond what Morgan Stanley has already paid. Stock fraud lawyers say Morgan Stanley did not admit or deny the FINRA charges.

Reportedly, the violations affected 116 corporate and agency bond customer transactions and 165 municipal bond customer transactions.

Published on: September 17, 2013

Unsuitable Recommendations of Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I May Give Rise to FINRA Arbitration Claims

by InvestorLawyers

Investors who suffered significant losses as a result of the unsuitable recommendation of Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I from a full-service brokerage firm can contact a securities fraud attorney to determine if they wish to pursue legal claims through Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration.

An announcement from Behringer Harvard Holdings LLC stated that affiliates of Behringer Harvard and a board of directors special committee of Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I had entered into contractual arrangements, initiating the process of making the REIT self-managed. However, the management team for the REIT will remain basically unchanged. Five of the executives will become employees of the REIT instead of employees of Behringer Harvard. Furthermore, Mark T. Alfieri will replace Robert S. Aisner, who will remain an employee of Behringer Harvard, as the REIT’s CEO.

Typically, non-traded REITs carry a high commission, sometimes as high as 15 percent, which motivates brokers to make unsuitable recommendations to their clients. Non-traded REITs such as the Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I are attractive to investors because they carry a relatively high dividend or interest. However, in some instances brokers have sold the REITs without disclosing the risks of principal loss and/or the fact that the investor’s funds may be tied up for several years due to the limited market for resale of non-traded REIT shares.

Published on: September 10, 2013

Unsuitable Recommendation of ELKs Leads to Claims Against Citigroup

by InvestorLawyers

Unsuitable Recommendation of ELKs Leads to Claims Against Citigroup

ELKs are sometimes called reverse convertibles and can carry high risks. As a hybrid debt security, the return on this type of investment is linked to an underlying equity, most commonly a stock. Usually, ELKs mature in a year and, if the value of the ELK falls below a pre-set price, the investor will not receive cash but, instead, the investment is converted into shares in the underlying security. The value of these shares can be worth less than the investor’s initial investment. According to stock fraud lawyers, ELKs are structured products that are, in some cases, part of a speculative investment strategy that is unsuitable for many investors.

According to the Statement of Claim in this case, the 91-year-old female investor was allegedly sold an investment strategy that involved asset allocation that was unsuitable and materially flawed for an investor seeking conservation of principle. The claim is seeking $200,000 in damages for the investor and alleges fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and unsuitable sales.

According to securities fraud attorneys, firms have an obligation to fully disclose all the risks of a given investment when making recommendations, and those recommendations must be suitable for the individual investor receiving the recommendation given his or her age, investment objectives and risk tolerance.

Published on: August 27, 2013

Securities Arbitration Investigations Continue as FINRA Files Formal Complaint Against Thompson National Properties

by InvestorLawyers

Securities fraud attorneys continue to investigate claims on behalf of investors who suffered significant losses in Thompson National Properties (TNP) promissory note investments. Specifically, investors may bave viable claims regarding three note programs sold by TNP from 2008 to 2012 that, according to a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) complaint dated July 30, 2013, allegedly were used in defrauding and deceiving investors. The complaint names Tony Thompson, Thompson National Properties LLC and TNP Securities LLC and is the first formal action against Thompson by FINRA.

According to stock fraud lawyers, $50 million in TNP-sponsored high-yield promissory notes were sold to investors, claiming guaranteed principal and interest. A summary of the allegations b7y FINRA in Mr. Thompson and TNP Securities’ BrokerCheck profile states that they “engaged in transactions, practices or courses of business which operated as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser.” Furthermore, FINRA’s allegations against TNP Securities and Mr. Thompson include the use of deceptive, manipulative or other fraudulent devices, which allege4dly puts them in violation of FINRA Rule 2020 and the Exchange Act of 1934.

Specifically, the complaint discusses the TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program LLC, the TNP Profit Participation Program LLC and the TNP 12% Notes Program LLC.

Published on: August 20, 2013

SEC to Discuss Uniform Fiduciary Standard Rule for Brokers

by InvestorLawyers

According to a recent article in Investment News, Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Mary Jo White, wants the SEC to decide as soon as possible whether to propose a rule that would raise the standards for investment advice given by brokers. Securities fraud attorneys say a rule of this kind would play a significant part in protecting investors and could make it easier to determine misconduct in securities arbitration.

SEC to Discuss Uniform Fiduciary Standard Rule for Brokers

Stock fraud lawyers expect the commission, which consists of five members, will be split on this controversial issue. A cost-benefit analysis is being conducted by the SEC regarding a potential rule. In an interview, SEC Commissioner Daniel Gallagher said the potential rule hasn’t been a “front burner issue,” but it soon will be.

“We really need to decide, based on what we’ve seen, whether it makes sense to move forward,” Gallagher stated.

Published on: August 15, 2013

Investors Could Recover Losses for TNP-Sponsored Investments

by InvestorLawyers

Stock fraud lawyers are currently investigating claims on behalf of investors who suffered significant losses in several TNP-sponsored investments, including the TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program LLC, sold by Berthel Fisher & Co. Financial Services Inc. and other full-service brokerage firms. Reportedly, around $26 million was raised from investors in total for the TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program and, though Berthel Fisher acted as the underwriter for the deal, the investment was also sold by other broker-dealers.

Investors Could Recover Losses for TNP-Sponsored Investments

According to the allegations made by one investor, Berthel Fisher failed to make the proper disclosures and perform adequate due diligence regarding the TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program. A complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa on July 8, which stated, “Berthel Fisher had actual knowledge of the misrepresentations and omission in the 2008 [private-placement memorandum] and failed to investigate red flags that pointed to other misrepresentations and omissions.”

The deal’s sponsor, Thompson National Properties LLC, and chief executive Tony Thompson have also been under investigation by securities arbitration lawyers for the TNP Strategic Retail Trust Inc., a non-traded REIT, and the TNP 12% Notes Program. Allegedly, the TNP Strategic Retail Trust was recommended to many investors for which it was unsuitable, given their age, risk tolerances and investment objectives. Reportedly, the 12% Notes Program, which was designed to raise capital for tenant-in-common real estate operations, suspended interest payments to investors and was in danger of defaulting on two loans.