Securities Fraud

Published on: July 11, 2012

Victims of Bruce Harada Fraud Could Recover Losses

Stock fraud lawyers are currently investigating claims on behalf of investors who suffered losses as a result of their investment with Bruce Harada, a former financial advisor for ING Financial Partners/ING Financial Advisors LLC. Reportedly, Harada has been charged with one count of money laundering and two counts of securities fraud. According to the accusations, Harada allegedly stole over $2 million from a minimum of 21 victims in Hawaii. At the time of the theft, Harada reportedly managed compensation plans for retired and active employees of ING, and was acting as an independent financial adviser for the firm.

Victims of Bruce Harada Fraud Could Recover Losses

According to securities arbitration lawyers, brokerage firms have an obligation to adequately supervise financial advisors in their employ. They must ensure that agents comply with any applicable securities laws. ING may be liable for losses suffered by investors as a result of Harada’s actions if it can be proven that the firm failed to execute adequate supervision of Harada.

The FINRA Broker Report (CRD) for Bruce Harada states that he was working for ING Financial Partners/ING Financial Advisors LLC from January 2007 until the end of May 2012. Harada worked out of ING’s Honolulu, Hawaii office. Furthermore, the CRD indicates that before working for ING, Harada worked, from March 1999 through December 2006, for Financial Network Investment Corporation. In addition, stock fraud lawyers say Harada is the subject of 9 ongoing customer complaints. ING has terminated his employment for “violation of firm’s policies and procedures regarding the handling of customer funds.”

Published on: July 9, 2012

Desert Capital REIT Investors Could Recover Losses

by InvestorLawyers

Investment fraud lawyers are currently filing claims on behalf of investors who suffered significant losses as a result of their investment in Desert Capital REIT. Recently, a claim was filed on behalf of two individuals. Both of these investors were retirees, ages 81 and 88. The claim, which is seeking $130,000 in damages, was filed with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

Desert Capital REIT Investors Could Recover Losses

The claim alleges that the Calton representative who solicited the Desert Capital REIT investment to the claimants was aware that the investors were retired and represented the investment as an income-producing, low-risk investment. Allegedly, the representative stated the REIT had a good reputation of paying dividends and would, therefore, be a good addition to the income-producing portfolio of the claimants. The claimants could not afford an illiquid, high-risk, speculative investment because their only source of income came from their investments and social security.

Securities fraud attorneys have stated that since REITs are, in fact, illiquid, non-traded investments, many REITs are not a suitable investment for all investors. FINRA rules have established that firms have an obligation to fully disclose all the risks of a given investment when making recommendations, and those recommendations must be suitable for the individual investor receiving the recommendation. Furthermore, brokerage firms must, before approving an investment’s sale to a customer, conduct a reasonable investigation of the securities and issuer. The claim states that the Calton representative and the firm itself did not perform the necessary due diligence and misrepresented the risks of Desert Capital REIT.

Published on: July 6, 2012

Investors of Deutsche Bank Structured Products Could Recover Losses

by InvestorLawyers

Stock fraud lawyers are currently investigating potential claims on behalf of customers who suffered losses as a result in their investment in a Deutsche Bank-created structured product or products. In some cases, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority-registered brokerage firms may be held liable for having improperly sold structured products to their clients, such as those created by Deutsche Bank.

Investors of Deutsche Bank Structured Products Could Recover Losses

Typically, structured products are notes or debt instruments created by investment sponsors. These products are linked to assets such as stock, which are linked to another asset or assets. These investments are extremely complex and, as a result, are not appropriate for unsophisticated investors who are not capable of understanding the risks and complexity of the investment.

Because an income component is typically offered with structured products, they are appealing to fixed income individuals, such as retirees. Despite the fact the investment is not suitable for many individuals, they continue to be pushed by brokerage firms because of the high commissions offered in association with their creation and sale. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority rules have established that firms have an obligation to fully disclose all the risks of a given investment when making recommendations, and those recommendations must be suitable for the individual investor receiving the recommendation given their age, investment objectives and risk tolerance. Furthermore, investment fraud lawyers say that brokerage firms must, before approving an investment’s sale to a customer, conduct a reasonable investigation of the securities and issuer.

Published on: July 5, 2012

More Trouble for Investors of Behringer Harvard

by InvestorLawyers

Stock fraud lawyers have been investigating claims on behalf of investors of Behringer Harvard Holdings LLC for several months, but recent news shows even more trouble may be ahead for these investors. Apparently, Behringer Harvard is having significant difficulty making loan payments on two of its offerings. As a result, Behringer is losing real estate assets.

More Trouble for Investors of Behringer Harvard

Securities fraud attorneys say that earlier this month, several properties related to the nontraded Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT I went into bankruptcy protection after negotiations over debt, amounting to $48.3 million, failed. Furthermore, the Behringer Harvard Short-term Opportunity Fund I LP, a private placement, entered into a “deed in lieu of foreclosure agreement.” This agreement was entered into in June 2012 and transferred properties to the lender.

At the end of 2011, Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT I suffered an estimated value decline of 46 percent. According to stock fraud lawyers, this decline represents a reduction from $7.66 per share a year earlier to $4.12 at the end of 2011. In addition, as of December 31, 2011, Behringer Harvard Short-term Opportunity Fund I LP investors saw their investment drop in value from $6.48 per share on December 31, 2010 to a staggering 40 cents per share. The Short-term Opportunity Fund I had total assets amounting to around $130 million. To make matters worse, the Opportunity REIT I has total assets amounting to $524.4 million, with an additional $68.4 million in debt that will mature this year.

Published on: July 4, 2012

Broker Charged with Fraud Related to Astrology-based Investment Strategy

by InvestorLawyers

Investment fraud lawyers are currently investigating potential claims on behalf of customers of Gurudeo “Buddy” Persaud, an Orlando, Florida broker. A recent announcement by the Securities and Exchange Commission stated that the SEC has charged Persaud with defrauding investors. Allegedly, Persaud’s fraud involved the use of an investment strategy based on astrology.

Broker Charged with Fraud Related to Astrology-based Investment Strategy

According to the charges, which were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Persaud allegedly persuaded investors to give him money for investments he promised were “safe” and that would return 6-18 percent on their investment. Persaud managed to raise $1 million from investors. However, SEC enforcers allege that Persaud’s market-timing service made forecasts that were based on gravitational pull and lunar cycles. The strategy is apparently based on the idea that mass human behavior and, as a result, the stock market, are affected by gravitational forces. Investors were not made aware of the alleged basis of Persaud’s strategy and most securities arbitration lawyers would agree that astrology is not a sound basis for an investment strategy.

Furthermore, Persaud allegedly misappropriated around $415,000 of investor money for his personal use and lost $400,000 as a result of the investment strategy.

Published on: July 2, 2012

Investors of Bank of America Structured Products Could Recover Losses

by InvestorLawyers

Securities fraud attorneys are currently investigating potential claims on behalf of customers who suffered losses as a result in their investment in a Bank of America-created structured product or products. In some cases, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority-registered brokerage firms may be held liable for having improperly sold structured products to their clients, such as those created by Bank of America.

Investors of Bank of America Structured Products Could Recover Losses

Typically, structured products are notes or debt instruments created by investment sponsors. These products are linked to assets such as stock, which are linked to another asset or assets. These investments are extremely complex and, as a result, are not appropriate for unsophisticated investors who are not capable of understanding the risks and complexity of the investment.

Because an income component is typically offered with structured products, they are appealing to fixed income individuals, such as retirees. Despite the fact the investment is not suitable for many individuals, they continue to be pushed by brokerage firms because of the high commissions offered in association with their creation and sale. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority rules have established that firms have an obligation to fully disclose all the risks of a given investment when making recommendations, and those recommendations must be suitable for the individual investor receiving the recommendation given their age, investment objectives and risk tolerance. Furthermore, securities arbitration lawyers say that brokerage firms must, before approving an investment’s sale to a customer, conduct a reasonable investigation of the securities and issuer.

Published on: June 29, 2012

News: Merrill Lynch Fined by FINRA

by InvestorLawyers

A June 21^st announcement by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) stated that the regulator has fined Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. The firm was fined $2.8 million for supervisory failures and failing to provide required trade notices, and ordered to pay $32 million in remediation to affected customers, plus interest. The supervisory failures allegedly resulted in overcharging customers in the form of unwarranted fees amounting to $32 million. Securities arbitration lawyers continue to file claims on behalf of investors who have been overcharged by the firms with which they invest.

News: Merrill Lynch Fined by FINRA

According to FINRA’s findings, Merrill Lynch failed to provide an adequate supervisory system from April 2003 to December 2011. This lack of adequate supervision allegedly resulted in customer billing that was not in accordance with contract and disclosure documents. This inaccurate billing affected almost 95,000 customer accounts. The unwarranted fees, plus interest, have since been returned to the affected customers by Merrill Lynch. Securities fraud attorneys say that when firms do not provide adequate supervisory systems, they can be held responsible for investor losses. This applies to both overcharges and instances where the firm does not supervise its brokers, some of whom then commit fraud.

In addition, Merrill Lynch did not provide customers with timely trade confirmations, as a result of computer programming errors, in certain advisory programs. Because of these errors, over 10.6 million trades in more than 230,000 customer accounts did not receive trade confirmations. Furthermore, Merrill Lynch did not properly identify its role on account statements and trade confirmations in certain transactions, specifically whether it acted as principal or agent. Securities arbitration lawyers, and FINRA’s decision, support the idea that computer programming errors are never an excuse for improper conduct on the part of a securities firm.

Published on: June 28, 2012

Investors Beware Retirement Account Fraud

by InvestorLawyers

Investment fraud lawyers are currently investigating potential claims on behalf of investors who suffered losses as a result of a breach of fiduciary duty related to their retirement accounts.

Investors Beware Retirement Account Fraud

Cofounder and director of Results One Financial LLC, Steven Salutric, was recently ordered to restore $1,211,902.25 to clients who held pension plans with him. The money was allegedly withdrawn from four pension plans between 2005 and 2009. This action violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Allegations against Salutric stated that he misdirected client assets to entities such as a restaurant, a film distribution company, a real estate partnership and the church at which he served as treasurer. Salutric had a personal interest in all these entities, according to stock fraud lawyers.

“It is particularly egregious when those entrusted with protecting workers’ retirement assets jeopardize them by committing illegal acts for personal gain,” Hilda L.Solis, secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor, said.

Published on: June 27, 2012

Mountain V Oil and Gas Investors Could Recover Losses

by InvestorLawyers

Investment fraud lawyers currently are investigating potential claims on behalf of investors who suffered significant losses as a result of their investment in a Mountain V Oil and Gas investment, or other similar investments. In many cases, broker-dealers improperly recommended these risky investments to clients for whom the investment was unsuitable.

Mountain V Oil and Gas Investors Could Recover Losses

Mountain V’s headquarters are in Bridgeport, West Virginia. Steve and Mike Shaver founded Mountain V Oil & Gas Inc. in March of 1994. It was founded in order to acquire and develop gas and oil reserves located in the Appalachian Basin.

According to investment fraud lawyers, oil and gas investments are not suitable for unsophisticated investors because of the substantial risks involved. These investments should only be recommended to sophisticated investors.

Published on: June 25, 2012

Paladin Realty Income Properties REIT, Wells REIT Investors Could Recover Losses

by InvestorLawyers

Securities fraud attorneys are currently investigating claims on behalf of investors who have suffered significant losses as a result of their investment in Wells or Paladin Realty Income Properties REITs.

Paladin Realty Income Properties REIT and Wells REIT Investors Could Recover Losses

Reportedly, investors were recently told by Paladin Reality Income Properties Inc. that its stock would cease to be sold next month because its current scale cannot cover expenses. This comes after it raised, in more than four years, $78.7 million. Reports about Wells Real Estate Funds state that, in an attempt to cut costs, the firm laid off its executive sales staff recently. This is not a good sign for investors, who are hoping their investment will rebound after dividend cuts and price drops.

Securities fraud attorneys have stated that as illiquid, non-traded investments, many REITs are not a suitable investment for all investors. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority rules have established that firms have an obligation to fully disclose all the risks of a given investment when making recommendations, and those recommendations must be suitable for the individual investor receiving the recommendation. Furthermore, brokerage firms must, before approving an investment’s sale to a customer, conduct a reasonable investigation of the securities and issuer.